Indian Burial and Sacred Grounds Watch

homemission
siteslearnactionlinkscontact

Subjects

Active cases

Closed cases

Wall of Shame

Please inform the webmaster of any broken links!

Sites in Need of Protection

Summertown Indian Mounds, Gwinnett County, Georgia

Outcome:

October 25, 2001

Everyone, I have just found out that Gwinnett County GA closed on the purchase of the 200 acres that will remain as Green space. This acreage includes the Summertown Burial Grounds that we all fought so hard to save earlier in the year. We have archived a complete victory on this one and each of you have my thanks for all of the work and support.

Edward Reynolds

_____________________________

The (Past) Issue

Near Stone Mountain GA, on a tract of land that borders the Old Indian trail, today known as the Hightower trail, are quite a few Indian mounds which are thought to be burial mounds. A battle has been going on for some time between the owner of the tract who wants to develop it and several organizations concerned with preservation of the mounds. A deal was worked out to have the county buy the land and have it remain untouched, and to this end the county passed a sales tax that would provide the money for the land. Despite the passing of the tax, the commissioners are now leaning toward not buying the tract and allowing the owner to continue his bid to develop the tract of land on which the mounds are located.

Online Resources for Reading:

Visit the Summertown web site.

Action:

Addresses are provided at the site for letter writing campaigns. There is an on-line petition at Summertown Burial Mounds website.

Contact:

Edward Reynolds or Janet Nuszbaum at 678-428-7849

Updates: 2001 27 Jan--The Gwinnett County Commission has voted to buy the property and if the owner does not accept their offer, they will condemn the property and take it for greenspace anyway. There still remains a question about a 15 acres out piece, but it is believed that it will be acquired in a seperate agreement, as it is of little commercial value without the largest piece. So it appears that a victory is within sight.


Updates:24 March 2001, from Edward Reynolds

As of my last post, the County Commission had voted to acquire this largest track of land and if the owner would not sell it they would condemn it. The smaller 15 acre commercial track was not included in this purchase.

Since that update, the owner has taken the County to court seeking to force the county to aquire the additional 15 acres, because the cost of developing it is too high with out the additional larger 178 acre track which the county intends to condemn. It apears at this time that all development of both tracks has been avoided until the court rules on this. If the courts side with the land owned the 15 acres could be included in the greenspace. If they do not side with the land owner and he is forced to keep the 15 acres, it is unlikely that he will invest the money into the property to develop it at this time. But for now, nothing will be disturbed.

As a side note. Two of the County Commissioners, who were newly elected and who ran on a no growth ticket, now are facing an increasingly hostile lack of support base. People are talking recall. Interestingly enough, the 3 votes to aquire the properety came from the established commissioners...



home : mission : updates : sites : learn : action : links : contact



Disclaimer

The IBSGWATCH web site is intended to enhance access to and dissemination of information on causes concerned with Indian burial and sacred grounds. The goal is to keep this information timely and accurate. If errors are brought to our attention, we will correct them.

IBSGWATCH is an outgrowth of IBGAG but is independent and not affiliated with any particular group or organization mentioned on these pages. Burial and Sacred Grounds issues on this site are addressed by a variety of organizations and groups; this does not infer or imply any affiliation between the different organizations and groups listed unless explicitly stated. The opinions stated and actions taken by various groups are not necessarily shared or supported by IBSGWATCH or other groups and organizations connected with burial and sacred ground issues presented on this site.


Best viewed at screen resolutions 1024 x 768 and 800 x 600
Copyright Information
For site problems contact the webmaster